PLANS to create a children’s home which were thrown out by Barnsley Council have been dismissed again following an appeal.

Pearl Home Care’s bid to convert a four-bedroom property, on Verona Rise in Darfield, had been rejected by the local authority’s planning board due to concerns over noise and disturbance.

Their proposals outlined plans to cater for three children, with six members of staff, but planners decided its location was not suitable given it’s on a residential street.

However, Pearl Home Care then appealed with the Planning Inspectorate, a government-run body which has the power to overturn a council’s decision if it’s deemed unjust.

Following an investigation carried out by inspector Andrew Hickey, the council’s decision was upheld.

A report said: “During staff changeovers and required trips for staff

and children, there will be additional noise and disturbance from these vehicles, which are likely to be in motion throughout the day.

“The number of these vehicle movements would likely be more than would be associated with a typical family dwelling, leading to additional noise and disturbance to nearby occupants of homes.

articlempu1

“Consequently, the intensification of the appeal property brought about by the change of use would create an increase in the level of activity on this section of the street.

“This will increase the general comings and goings and activity of the

property, beyond that expected of a family dwelling in this location, to the detriment of neighbouring occupiers.

articlempu2

“I acknowledge that the proposed short-stay residential care facility would deliver benefits related to children, a group with the protected characteristic of age, which could also include those with disabilities.

“Nevertheless, based on the totality of the evidence before me, including that of need, I have found that the harm caused would outweigh the benefits of the proposed development, which would be

contrary to the development plan.

articlempu3

“As such, I am satisfied that my approach would be proportionate in these circumstances.”